“What’s in a Name?”: The Effect of AI Agent Naming on Psychological Ownership and Responsible Behaviors in the Shared Economy

Authors

  • Liying Zhou Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, China Author
  • Valerie Lynette Wang West Chester University, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63522/jabbs.102008

Keywords:

AI agent naming; Psychological ownership; Responsible behaviors; Shared economy; Interaction frequency; Usage context

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to permeate shared economy services, understanding how AI design elements impact user behavior has become increasingly important. This research examines how naming AI agents influences responsible behaviors in shared economy contexts and explores psychological ownership as a mediating mechanism. Across four experiments, we demonstrate that allowing users to name AI agents significantly increases their likelihood to engage in responsible behaviors, such as conserving resources and maintaining shared property. We further investigate two theory-driven moderators—interaction frequency and usage context (private vs. public)—that impact the strength of this naming effect on responsible behaviors via psychological ownership. Our findings offer theoretical insights into the underlying processes that enhance responsible behaviors in the shared economy and provide actionable guidance for practitioners aiming to foster user responsibility through AI design.

References

Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Personalization technologies: A process-oriented perspective. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089107.1089109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1089107.1089109

Atasoy, O., & Morewedge, C. K. (2018). Digital goods are valued less than physical goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1343-1357. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx102

Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583

Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1086/666376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/666376

Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2017). Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582-597. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx050

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209154

Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715-734. https://doi.org/10.1086/612649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/612649

Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T., & Kandampully, J. (2017). A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors. Journal of Business Research, 79, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004

Bock, D. E., Wolter, J. S., & Ferrell, O. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence: disrupting what we know about services. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(3), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0047

Bolton, R. N., & Lemon, K. N. (1999). A dynamic model of customers' usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600203

Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.008

Chen, C. D., Yen, D. C., & Hwang, M. I. (2012). Factors influencing the continuance intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 933-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.014

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs an-d the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of a-nthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

Eyssel, F., & Hegel, F. (2012). (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2213-2230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x

Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., & Schreier, M. (2010). The psychological effects of empowerment str-ategies on consumers' product demand. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.1.65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.1.65

Franke, N., Schreier, M., & Kaiser, U. (2010). The “I designed it myself” effect in mass customization. Management Science, 56(1), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1077

Fritze, M. P., Marchand, A., Eisingerich, A. B., & Benkenstein, M. (2020). Access-based services as substitutes for material possessions: the role of psychological ownership. Journal of Service Research, 23(3), 368-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520907691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520907691

Gao, Y., & Liu, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence-enabled personalization in interactive marketing: a customer journey perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(5), 663-680. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2022-0023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2022-0023

Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057

Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552

Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of"the tragedy of the commons". Science, 280(5364), 682-683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.682

Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: Aregression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24018134

Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517752459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517752459

Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9

Huang, L., Yuan, H., Dong, X., Chen, Z., & Zhou, L. (2023). Social norms and socially responsible consumption behavior in the sharing economy: The mediation role of reciprocity motivation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137750

Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2015). Individual psychological ownership: Concepts, evidence, and implications for research in marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002330

Karahanna, E., Xu, S. X., & Zhang, N. (2015). Psychological ownership motivation and use ofsocial media. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002336

Kim, K., & McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1086/658148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/658148

Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006

Kirk, C. P., Swain, S. D., & Gaskin, J. E. (2015). I'm proud of it: Consumer technology appropriation and psychological ownership. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002335

Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0368

Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., & Gardner, J. (2007). A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477-500. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.5.477-500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.5.477-500

Mittal, B. (2006). I, me, and mine—how products become consumers' extended selves. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(6), 550-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.202

Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1086/209566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209566

Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W., Shu, S. B., & Small, D. A. (2021). Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 196-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920957007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920957007

Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153

Peck, J., Kirk, C. P., Luangrath, A. W., & Shu, S. B. (2021). Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. Journal of Marketing, 85(2), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920952084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920952084

Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/598614

Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological ownership and the organizational context: Theory, research evidence, and application. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934451.00016

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownershipin organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259124

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integ-rating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.7.1.84

Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Next generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii-ix. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/113653/

Shu, S. B., & Peck, J. (2011). Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002

Stoner, J. L., Loken, B., & Stadler Blank, A. (2018). The name game: How naming products increases psychological ownership and subsequent consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1005

Sundar, S. S. (2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of h-uman–AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026

Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization vs. customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x

Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249

Verhagen, T., van Nes, J., Feldberg, F., & van Dolen, W. (2014). Virtual customer service agents: Using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 529-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12066

Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336

Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005

White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012).Belief in a just world: Consumer intentionsand behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0581

Downloads

Published

2025-05-29

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Articles

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Liying Zhou, Valerie Lynette Wang (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“What’s in a Name?”: The Effect of AI Agent Naming on Psychological Ownership and Responsible Behaviors in the Shared Economy. (2025). Journal of Applied Business & Behavioral Sciences, 1(2), 144-162. https://doi.org/10.63522/jabbs.102008

Funding data