What's the Hidden Cost of Leaders Cyberloafing? Uncovering Its Impact on Employees Innovative Behavior and the Mechanisms Involved

Authors

  • Muhammad Naseer Akhtar University of East London, UK Author
  • Jingjing Wang Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, China Author
  • Ziyi Zhang Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, China Author
  • Yajun Zhang Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63522/jabbs.101003

Keywords:

Leaders’ cyberloafing; Innovative behavior; Workplace anxiety; Power dependence

Abstract

The widespread application of network technology in the workplace has given rise to the issue of leaders’ cyberloafing, which refers to leaders engaging in non-work-related online activities during working hours. Previous studies have revealed the trickle-down effect of leaders’ cyberloafing, but a comprehensive exploration of its impact on employees’ innovative behavior is still lacking. Considering this, we developed a moderated mediation model based on the cognitive appraisal theory of emotions to investigate how leaders’ cyberloafing affects employees’ innovative behavior. This study used hierarchical regression analysis to analyze a sample of 357 employees collected at three time points. The results indicate that leaders’ cyberloafing has a negative impact on employees’ innovative behavior. Workplace anxiety mediates the relationship between leaders’ cyberloafing and employees’ innovative behavior. Power dependence positively moderates the relationship between leaders’ cyberloafing and workplace anxiety, as well as the indirect effect of leaders’ cyberloafing on employees’ innovative behavior via workplace anxiety. This study identifies the detrimental effect of leaders’ cyberloafing on employees’ innovative behavior and its underlying mechanisms. It also inspires organizations to promote employees’ innovative behavior by regulating leaders’ cyberloafing and the exercise of power.

References

Agarwal, U. A., & Avey, J. B. (2020). Abusive supervisors and employees who cyberloaf: Examining the roles of psychological capital and contract breach. Internet Research, 30(3), 789-809. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2019-0208

Askew, K. L., Ilie, A., Bauer, J. A., Simonet, D. V., Buckner, J. E., & Robertson, T. A. (2019). Disentangling how coworkers and supervisors influence employee cyberloafing: What normative information are employees attending to? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(4), 526-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818813091

Bani-Melhem, S., Quratulain, S., & Al-Hawari, M. A. (2021). Does employee resilience exacerbate the effects of abusive supervision? A study of frontline employees’ self-esteem, turnover intention, and innovative behaviors. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(5), 611-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1860850

Bhattacharjee, A., & Sarkar, A. (2024). Abusive supervision and cyberloafing: An investigation based on Stressor-Emotion-CWB theory. Information Technology & People, 37(3), 1126-1155. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-05-2022-0353

Cheng, B. H., & McCarthy, J. M. (2018). Understanding the dark and bright sides of anxiety: A theory of workplace anxiety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(5), 537-560. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000266

Cheng, B., Zhou, X., Guo, G., & Yang, K. (2020). Perceived overqualification and cyberloafing: A moderated-mediation model based on equity theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 565-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4026-8

Fan, J., Fan, Y., He, J., & Dai, H. (2023). How does a good leader-member relationship motivate employees’ innovative behaviour? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(8), 1016-1036. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-04-2023-0180

Gao, Q., Zhang, K., Cao, Y., Li, J., Bian, R., & Wang, X. H. (2024). The effect of negative workplace gossip about supervisor on workplace deviance and impression management: The m-ediating roles of anxiety and guilt. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(2), 435-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09888-6

Gelaidan, H. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Al-Hakimi, M. A. (2024). Servant and authentic leadership as drivers of innovative work behaviour: The moderating role of creative self-efficacy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(6), 1938-1966. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2022-0382

Henle, C. A. (2024). Shifting the literature from who and when to why: Identifying cyberloafing motives. Applied Psychology, 73(1), 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12470

Houghton, J. D., & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: When should self-leadership be encouraged? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190501100406

Jeong, Y., Jung, H., & Lee, J. (2020). Cyberslacking or smart work: Smartphone usage log-analysis focused on app-switching behavior in work and leisure conditions. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1597574

Jiang, W., Zhang, H., Wang, L., & Zheng, C. (2020). Team leader job anxiety and team innovation: The roles of self-serving behavior and psychological entitlement. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(5), 2415-2425. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3003691

Kloutsiniotis, P. V., Mihail, D. M., Mylonas, N., & Pateli, A. (2022). Transformational leaders-hip, HRM practices and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of personal stress, anxiety, and workplace loneliness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103177

Korku, C., & Kaya, S. (2023). Relationship between authentic leadership, transformational lead-ership and innovative work behavior:Mediating role of innovation climate. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(3), 1128-1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2112445

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive motivational relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.46.8.819

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010304

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7

Li, C., Makhdoom, H. U. R., & Asim, S. (2020). Impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovative work behavior: Examining mediation and moderation mechanisms. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 105-118. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S236876

Li, H., Zhang, S., Mo, S., & Newman, A. (2024). Relative leader-member exchange and unethical pro-leader behavior: The role of envy and distributive justice climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 192(1), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05492-z

Lim, P. K., Koay, K. Y., & Chong, W. Y. (2021). The effects of abusive supervision, emotional exhaustion and organizational commitment on cyberloafing: A moderated-mediation examination. Internet Research, 31(2), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-03-2020-0165

Lui, S., Lai, J., Luo, B., & Moran, P. (2023). Will goal clarity lower team innovation? A moderated mediation model of inter-team trust. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 975-992. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2021-0787

Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732

Malibari, M. A., & Bajaba, S. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership and employees’ innovative behavior: A sequential mediation analysis of innovation climate and employees’ intellectual agility. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100255

McCarthy, J. M., Trougakos, J. P., & Cheng, B. H. (2016). Are anxious workers less productive workers? It depends on the quality of social exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000044

Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554

Peng, J., Hou, N., Zou, Y., & Long, R. (2023). Participative leadership and employees’ cyberl-oafing: A self-concept-based theory perspective. Information & Management, 60(8), 103878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103878

Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462

Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for ind-irect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679848

Rodell, J. B., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1438-1451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016752

Samma, M., Zhao, Y., Rasool, S. F., Han, X., & Ali, S. (2020). Exploring the relationship between innovative work behavior, job anxiety, workplace ostracism, and workplace incivility: Empirical evidence from small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Healthcare, 8(4), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040508

Schaerer, M., Du Plessis, C., Yap, A. J., & Thau, S. (2018). Low power individuals in social power research: A quantitative review, theoretical framework, and empirical test. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.08.004

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of i-ndividual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701

She, Z. L., & Li, Q. (2023). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between cyberloafing and task performance in public organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(4), 1141-1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05038-9

She, Z., Li, Q., & Ma, L. (2025). Witnessing cyberloafing: A daily diary study of observers’ reactions to cyberloafers. Journal of Business Ethics, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-05933-x

Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 7(3-4), 233-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409189

Tandon, A., Kaur, P., Ruparel, N., Ul Islam, J., & Dhir, A. (2022). Cyberloafing and cyberslacking in the workplace: Systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Internet Research, 32(1), 55-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-06-2020-0332

Tsai, H. Y. (2023). Do you feel like being proactive day? How daily cyberloafing influences creativity and proactive behavior: The moderating roles of work environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107470

Wee, E. X. M., Liao, H., Liu, D., & Liu, J. (2017). Moving from abuse to reconciliation: A power-dependence perspective on when and how a follower can break the spiral of abuse. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2352-2380. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0866

Wu, J. N., Mei, W. J., Liu, L., & Ugrin, J. C. (2020). The bright and dark sides of social cyberloafing: Effects on employee mental health in China. Journal of Business Research, 112(3), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.043

Wu, Z., Yang, F., & Wei, F. (2024). Exploration versus exploitation: How interorganizational power dependence influences SME product innovation? An empirical study in China. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(4), 1270-1298. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2022-0544

Yan, T. T., Venkataramani, V., Tang, C., & Hirst, G. (2025). Navigating inter-team competition: How information broker teams achieve team innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 110(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001216

Yang, H., Lin, Z., Chen, X., & Peng, J. (2023). Workplace loneliness, ego depletion and cyberloafing: Can leader problem-focused interpersonal emotion management help? Internet Research, 33(4), 1473-1494. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2021-0007

Yin, J., Ji, Y., & Ni, Y. (2023). Anxious hotel employees in China: Engaged or exhausted? Multiple effects of workplace anxiety. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 114, 103577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103577

Zhang, G. X., Zhong, J. A., & Ozer, M. (2020). Status threat and ethical leadership: A power-dependence perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 665-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3972-5

Zhang, J., Akhtar, M. N., Zhang, Y., & Sun, S. (2020). Are overqualified employees bad appl-es? A dual-pathway model of cyberloafing. Internet Research, 30(1), 289-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-10-2018-0469

Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & Akhtar, M. N. (2024). You have got a nerve: Examining the nexus between coworkers’ cyberloafing and workplace incivility. Internet Research, in press. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-09-2022-0700

Zhong, J., Chen, Y., Yan, J., & Luo, J. (2022). The mixed blessing of cyberloafing on innovation performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106982

Zhou, B., Li, Y., Hai, M., Wang, W., & Niu, B. (2021). Challenge-hindrance stressors and cyberloafing: A perspective of resource conservation versus resource acquisition. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1172-1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01505-0

Zhou, F., & Wu, Y. J. (2018). How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior: A two-way perspective on the leader-employee interaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2017-0181

Downloads

Published

2025-05-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

What’s the Hidden Cost of Leaders’ Cyberloafing? Uncovering Its Impact on Employees’ Innovative Behavior and the Mechanisms Involved. (2025). Journal of Applied Business & Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.63522/jabbs.101003