“Who Am I” Determines “What Do I Do”? How Does The Founder Identity Drives Innovation Behavior Through Entrepreneurial Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63522/jabbs.102009Keywords:
Founder identity; Innovation behavior; Entrepreneurial approachAbstract
This study examines how founder identity influences entrepreneurial innovation behavior by shaping the choice of learning approach. Drawing on social identity theory, the paper aim to deepen the understanding of how entrepreneurs’ self-perceived roles affect their motivation to learn and, consequently, the degree and type of innovation they pursue. A sample of 237 entrepreneurs was collected using snowball sampling and an online survey platform, investigating how three distinct founder identities—Darwinian, Communitarian, and Missionary—associate with exploratory versus exploitative learning in innovation. Grounded in social identity theory and the knowledge creation framework, the results provide empirical evidence that both Darwinian and Missionary identities significantly predict innovative behavior. Furthermore, entrepreneurs with a Darwinian identity tend toward exploitative learning (focusing on refinement/efficiency), while those with a Missionary identity favor exploratory learning (emphasizing experimentation/novelty). Missionary identity are more likely to engage in exploratory learning, emphasizing experimentation and novelty.
References
Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755-775. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700609
Cardon, M. S., Sudek, R., & Mitteness, C. (2009). The impact of perceived entrepreneurial passion on angel investing. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(2), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2009.44244277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2009.44244277
Cast, A. D. (2004). Well-being and the transition to parenthood: An identity theory approach. Sociological Perspectives, 47(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2004.47.1.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2004.47.1.55
Chen, S. X., Cheung, F. M., Bond, M. H., & Leung, J. P. (2005). Decomposing the construct of ambivalence over emotional expression in a Chinese cultural context. European Journal of Personality, 19(3), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.538
Corbett, A. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00094.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00094.x
Corbett, A. C. (2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.10.001
Damanpour, F. (2017). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
Elert, N., & Henrekson, M. (2017). Entrepreneurship and institutions: A bidirectional relationship. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 191-263. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000073
Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935-957. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0211
Hamilton, E. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning in family business: A situated learning perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111106406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111106406
Hoang, H., & Gimeno, J. (2010). Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.07.002
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/259266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259266
Holcomb, T. R., Ireland, R. D., Holmes, R. M., & Hitt, M. A. (2009). Architecture of Entrepreneurial Learning: Exploring the Link among Heuristics, Knowledge, and Action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00285.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00285.x
Hughes, M., Hughes, P., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: Implications for market and response performance. British Journal of Management, 18(4), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00519.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00519.x
Ko, E. J., & Kim, K. (2020). Connecting founder social identity with social entrepreneurial intentions. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(4), 403-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-02-2020-0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-02-2020-0012
Landström, H., Åström, F., & Harirchi, G. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship studies: One or two fields of research? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 493-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0282-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0282-3
Latham, S. F., & Braun, M. (2009). Managerial risk, innovation, and organizational decline. Journal of Management, 35(2), 258-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321549
Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822-846. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670902
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(00)00048-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
McDougall, P. P., Robinson Jr, R. B., & DeNisi, A. S. (1992). Modeling new venture performance: An analysis of new venture strategy, industry structure, and venture origin. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(4), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90002-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90002-9
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. (3rd edition) The Guilford Press.
Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (2001). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500301
Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L. W., Bird, B., Marie Gaglio, C., McMullen, J. S., Morse, E. A., & Smith, J. B. (2007). The Central Question in Entrepreneurial Cognition Research 2007. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00161.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00161.x
Murnieks, C., Mosakowski, E., & Cardon, M. S. (2014). Pathways of passion: Identity centrality, passion, and behavior among entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1583-1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311433855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311433855
Murnieks, C., & Mosakowski, E. (2007). Who am I? Looking inside the “founder identity.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 27(5), 1-14. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1064901
Nonaka, L., Takeuchi, H., & Umemoto, K. (2014). A theory of organizational knowledge creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7-8), 833-845. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1996.025472
Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 399-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x
Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011
Renko, M. (2013). Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1045-1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00522.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00522.x
Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
Shepherd, D., & Haynie, J. M. (2009). Family business, identity conflict, and an expedited entrepreneurial process: A process of resolving identity conflict. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1245-1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00344.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00344.x
Sieger, P., Gruber, M., Fauchart, E., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Measuring the social identity of entrepreneurs: Scale development and international validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 542–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.07.001
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840
Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? .Social Psychology Quarterly, 16-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786972
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). Organizational Identity: A Reader. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269464.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269464.001.0001
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Nelson-Hall.
Tan, J. (2001). Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(99)00056-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00056-7
Wei, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, J., & Gong, Y. (2019). Research on Factors Affecting the Entrepreneurial Learning From Failure: An Interpretive Structure Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01304
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203 https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shuojia G, Rongzhi Liu, Yihan Wang, Chao Zheng (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.